
I love AMD. They make powerful, affordable processors with low power consumption and set the standard in the industry for stability and innovation. First to market with stable 64-bit architectures, they continue to outperform Intel at every turn. Motherboards that support AMD processors consistently offer cutting-edge features, scalability and style.
Somehow, though, Intel has managed to maintain a vast majority of market share. How?
The link associated with the title of this post takes you to details of AMD’s case against Intel pointing out monopolistic deals and threats against retailers who buy from AMD.
When did competition cease to be a driver for innovation?
Once upon a time in America, competition drove business to redesign products and services (improve) or redefine them (innovate). Now, it appears the trend is to find ways to lockout competition instead of nurturing the mother of innovation.
It seems our generation is doomed to be hailed as a generation of both innovators and businessmen to supress that innovation. I’d like to blame Intel alone for this– They have far surpassed anything Microsoft ever got blamed for, but the fact is, retailers are as much to blame as Intel for not diversifying their vendors in the first place to protect themselves from giving one vendor the leverage necessary for such tactics to work.
I wonder now how Apple’s decision will effect the future of AMD… Apple, of all companies– Possibly the most visible of all innovators in the industry.



























